Dixie Exposes Expense Mixing

Dixie Phair (Any Municipality County’s Commercial Real Property Analyst) and Luke Warm (ownership tax representative) are mixing it up (having a discussion)…

Dixie: This is a well located property.

Luke: Well, it is and it isn’t.

Dixie: Why do you say that? The traffic count there is the highest in Any Municipality County, and the site has three drive cuts.

Luke: One cut is sort of smallish, and sometimes too much traffic is counterproductive. My client’s customers are busy people, and would avoid the area if they could.

Dixie: But actual store sale figures you provide prove that at least some of them keep coming back.

Luke: Doesn’t mean it’s not annoying to them. They have to buy stuff somewhere.

Dixie: So you are alleging 50% obsolescence to site and improvements for traffic congestion?

Luke: Should probably be more, but we’ll settle for 50% I guess.

Dixie: The new power center is just half a block away, and 90% of the outlots in that immediate area have national credit rated tenants. Do they suffer this same obsolescence from high traffic?

Luke: My client’s product sells itself. In fact, they probably could sell out with only an online presence.

Dixie: So why doesn’t he simply market online, then?

Luke: Expenses. He needs the expense of a bricks & mortar facility to offset his high income from sales.

Dixie: Great! What they claim to the IRS is their business, equitable real estate taxes included. But we will assign a triple net market rent to the real estate for assessment valuation. Those neighbors needing the exposure are our rent comparables!

This entry was posted in The Adventures of Dixie Phair. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.